कानुन प्रवेश – Legal Reasoning, संविधान, English, GK
कानुन प्रवेश – Legal Reasoning, संविधान, English, GK
Law Entrance – Legal Reasoning, Constitution, English & GK · १,८७३ प्रश्न
१,८७३ प्रश्न उपलब्ध। मोड छान्नुहोस्:
कानुन प्रवेश: प्रश्न र उत्तर
सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।
सही: ० / ०
-
Principle: An offer made to a particular person can be accepted only by that person. Facts: A offers to sell his house to B. C, who overhears the conversation, immediately says to A, 'I accept.' Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) There is no contract between A and C.
A specific offer can be accepted only by its addressee. C cannot step in and accept an offer that was not made to him.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Damages for breach of contract cover only losses that arise naturally from the breach or that both parties knew were likely when they made the contract. Facts: A carrier delays delivering a broken mill shaft for repair. The mill stands idle and loses profit, but the carrier was never told that the mill had no spare shaft. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) The carrier is not liable for the lost profits, because that loss was not within the parties' contemplation.
Under the rule in Hadley v Baxendale, special losses are recoverable only if communicated when contracting. The carrier did not know the mill would stop, so the loss was too remote.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A contract becomes void when, after it is made, performance becomes impossible because of an event for which neither party is responsible. Facts: A hires B's hall for a concert. Before the concert date, the hall is destroyed by an accidental fire without anyone's fault. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) The contract becomes void and neither party is liable for non-performance.
Supervening impossibility frustrates the contract, as in Taylor v Caldwell. Since neither party caused the fire, neither is liable.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Where both parties to an agreement are mistaken about a fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is void. Facts: A agrees to sell B a specific cargo said to be on a ship. Unknown to both, the cargo had already been destroyed before the agreement was made. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) The agreement is void, because both parties were mistaken about an essential fact.
A bilateral mistake about the very existence of the subject matter makes the agreement void (compare Couturier v Hastie). Neither party can enforce it.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: An agreement whose object is unlawful is void, and no court will enforce it. Facts: A promises to pay B Rs. 50,000 if B beats up C. B beats C, but A refuses to pay. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) B cannot recover the money, because the agreement is void.
An agreement to commit a crime has an unlawful object and is void from the beginning. Courts will not help a party enforce it even after performance.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A contract entered into because of coercion (a threat of unlawful harm) is voidable at the option of the party coerced. Facts: A threatens to kill B unless B signs a deed selling his land to A at a low price. B signs. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) The contract is voidable at B's option.
Consent given under threat is not free, so the coerced party can choose to avoid the contract. Only the victim of coercion, not the wrongdoer, has this option.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A promise without consideration (something given in return) is not enforceable as a contract. Facts: A orally promises to give B Rs. 10,000 as a gift, asking nothing in return. A later refuses to pay. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) B cannot enforce the promise, because there was no consideration.
Under the given principle, a bare promise with nothing in return is not a contract. B gave no consideration, so the promise cannot be enforced.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Displaying goods with price tags is only an invitation to make offers; it is the customer who makes the offer, which the seller may accept or refuse. Facts: A shop displays a watch priced at Rs. 2,000. Z picks it up and offers Rs. 2,000 at the counter, but the shopkeeper refuses to sell. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) The shopkeeper is not bound to sell, because the display was only an invitation to treat.
Under the stated principle, the customer makes the offer at the counter and the seller may refuse it. This is the rule in Pharmaceutical Society v Boots.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: An offer may be revoked at any time before it is accepted. Facts: A offers to sell his car to B for Rs. 8 lakh. Before B replies, A informs B that he withdraws the offer. B then says, 'I accept.' Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) There is no contract, because the offer was revoked before acceptance.
Once an offer is validly revoked before acceptance, there is nothing left to accept. B's later 'acceptance' cannot create a contract.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: An acceptance must be communicated to the offeror; a mental decision to accept is not enough. Facts: A offers to sell his motorbike to B. B decides in his own mind to accept but tells nobody, and A later sells the bike to C. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) There is no contract between A and B, because B never communicated acceptance.
Acceptance has legal effect only when it is communicated; an uncommunicated decision binds nobody. So A was free to sell to C.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
यी अभ्यास प्रश्न हुन्, आधिकारिक प्रश्न होइनन्। पाठ्यक्रम, विज्ञापन र नतिजाका लागि सम्बन्धित निकायको आधिकारिक वेबसाइट हेर्नुहोस्। उत्तरमा गल्ती भेटे प्रश्नमुनिको "टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट" मा लेख्नुहोस्।
नमस्ते! पाठ्यक्रम, सामान्य ज्ञान, भाषा परीक्षा वा कुनै प्रश्नको उत्तर बुझ्न सोध्नुहोस्।
AI ले गल्ती गर्न सक्छ। महत्वपूर्ण कुरा आधिकारिक स्रोतमा जाँच्नुहोस्।