कानुन प्रवेश परीक्षा LLB प्रवेश (३ वर्षे) तयारी
कानुन प्रवेश परीक्षा – LLB प्रवेश (३ वर्षे)
LLB Entrance · Law Entrance (BALLB & LLB)
१,८८० प्रश्न उपलब्ध। मोड छान्नुहोस्:
कानुन प्रवेश: प्रश्न र उत्तर
सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।
सही: ० / ०
-
Principle: A writ of mandamus can be issued to compel a public authority to perform a public duty imposed on it by law. Facts: An applicant fulfils every legal condition for a licence, and the law says the authority 'shall issue' it. The authority refuses without any reason. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) A writ of mandamus is the proper remedy.
Mandamus means 'we command' and compels performance of a legal duty. Habeas corpus deals with unlawful detention, and quo warranto with usurping a public office.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: An act done by an authority beyond the powers given to it by law is void (ultra vires). Facts: A municipality, empowered by law only to collect waste-management fees, issues an order imposing income tax on its residents. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) The order is void, because it is beyond the municipality's powers.
A body created by law can act only within the powers given to it. Imposing income tax lies outside its authority, so the order is ultra vires and void.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A person to whom a power has been delegated cannot further delegate it unless expressly permitted (delegatus non potest delegare). Facts: A statute gives the Chief District Officer power to cancel arms licences. Without any authority, the CDO hands this power to his office clerk, who cancels A's licence. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) The cancellation is invalid, because the power was wrongly sub-delegated.
Power given to a specific authority must be used by that authority unless sub-delegation is allowed. The clerk had no lawful power, so his order is invalid.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Equality before law does not prevent the State from making special provisions for groups that are socially or economically disadvantaged. Facts: The government reserves some scholarships only for students from economically poor families. A student from a rich family challenges this as discrimination. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) The scheme is valid as a special provision for the disadvantaged.
Equality allows positive measures that help disadvantaged groups catch up. A reasonable classification based on economic need is therefore permissible.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: No one shall be a judge in his own cause. Facts: A judge hears and decides a case involving a company in which his wife holds a large number of shares, without disclosing this. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) The decision can be challenged on the ground of bias.
The rule nemo judex in causa sua requires that justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. A family financial interest creates a reasonable likelihood of bias.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: An arrested person must be produced before the adjudicating authority within 24 hours of arrest, excluding the time needed for the journey. Facts: Police arrest A and keep him in custody for three days, without producing him before any court or adjudicating authority. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) A's detention after 24 hours is unlawful.
The 24-hour rule exists to put every arrest under prompt judicial control. Keeping A for three days without production breaks this requirement.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: No person accused of an offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. Facts: During trial, the court orders the accused to answer questions that would prove his guilt, and threatens to punish him if he stays silent. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) The order violates the right against self-incrimination.
The principle protects an accused from being forced to give evidence against himself. Compelling answers by threat of punishment directly breaches this right.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: No person shall be punished for an act which was not punishable by law when it was done. Facts: In 2020 A did an act that was lawful at the time. In 2023 a new law makes such acts a crime, and A is prosecuted for his 2020 act. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) A cannot be punished, because the act was lawful when it was done.
Criminal law cannot be applied retrospectively to acts that were lawful when done. The rule protects people who acted in reliance on the law of the time.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: No person shall be prosecuted or punished more than once for the same offence. Facts: A is tried for murder and acquitted by a competent court. A year later the police file a fresh case against A for the same murder. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) The second prosecution is barred.
This is the rule against double jeopardy: after a final acquittal for an offence, the person cannot be tried again for the same offence. The seriousness of the crime does not change this.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Kidnapping from lawful guardianship is taking a minor out of the keeping of the lawful guardian without the guardian's consent; the minor's own consent is irrelevant. Facts: Without telling her parents, A takes a 14-year-old girl away from her home to another city. The girl says she went willingly. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) A has committed kidnapping, because the guardian did not consent.
Under the stated principle, only the guardian's consent matters. The minor's willingness does not make the taking lawful.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
यी अभ्यास प्रश्न हुन्, आधिकारिक प्रश्न होइनन्। पाठ्यक्रम, विज्ञापन र नतिजाका लागि सम्बन्धित निकायको आधिकारिक वेबसाइट हेर्नुहोस्। उत्तरमा गल्ती भेटे प्रश्नमुनिको "टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट" मा लेख्नुहोस्।
नमस्ते! पाठ्यक्रम, सामान्य ज्ञान, भाषा परीक्षा वा कुनै प्रश्नको उत्तर बुझ्न सोध्नुहोस्।
AI ले गल्ती गर्न सक्छ। महत्वपूर्ण कुरा आधिकारिक स्रोतमा जाँच्नुहोस्।