चार्टर्ड एकाउन्टेन्सी CA (CAP I, II, III) र ACCA तयारी

CA / ACCA: प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

3351. Which of the following is a typical example of a contingent contract?

      कA contract of insurance खA wagering agreement गA contract for the sale of goods with immediate delivery घAn agreement with a minor
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3352. Under the contra proferentem rule, an ambiguous exclusion clause is interpreted:

      कBy ignoring the whole contract खAgainst the party seeking to rely on it गIn favour of the stronger party घIn favour of the party who drafted it
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3353. Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking (1971) held that, where a ticket is issued by an automatic machine:

      कNo contract exists at all खThe terms on the ticket always bind the customer गThe customer accepts by keeping the ticket घThe contract is made when the customer uses the machine, so later-notified terms do not bind
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3354. In Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel (1949), the exclusion notice in the hotel bedroom was ineffective because:

      कHotels cannot exclude liability in any case खIt was brought to the guest's attention after the contract had been made गIt was not in writing घThe guest was a minor
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3355. L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd (1934) established that a person who signs a contractual document:

      कIs bound by its terms even if they have not read them खIs bound only by the terms they have read गCan always avoid exclusion clauses घIs bound only if a witness was present
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3356. Hongkong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (1962) introduced the concept of:

      कPostal acceptance खAnticipatory breach गInnominate (intermediate) terms घPromissory estoppel
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3357. Breach of a warranty in a contract entitles the innocent party to:

      कClaim damages only खTerminate the contract and claim damages गClaim specific performance as of right घHave the contract declared void
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3358. In Cutter v Powell (1795), a sailor who died before the voyage ended could recover nothing because:

      कThe ship owner had become insolvent खThe contract was illegal गThe contract was an entire contract requiring complete performance घHe had breached a warranty
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3359. A claim for reasonable payment for work actually done, where the contract is discharged before completion, is known as:

      कNemo dat खCaveat emptor गRes ipsa loquitur घQuantum meruit
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3360. Which statement about specific performance is correct?

      कIt is a common law remedy for unliquidated damages खIt is the usual remedy for the sale of ordinary goods गIt is available as of right for every breach घIt is a discretionary equitable remedy, usually refused for contracts of personal service
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।