Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

231. Principle: A tenant must not use leased property for a purpose substantially different from that for which it was leased; if he does, the landlord may terminate the lease. Facts: A house is leased to T for residential use only. T converts it into a noisy bar without the landlord's permission. Decide.

     कThe landlord may terminate the lease खThe landlord may only increase the rent गThe landlord must allow it, since T pays the rent घThe landlord can act only after the lease term ends
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

232. Principle: A marriage in which either party is below the minimum age fixed by law (20 years) is void and punishable, regardless of the consent of the parties or their parents. Facts: With the consent of both families, a 17-year-old girl is married to a 24-year-old man. Decide.

     कThe marriage is valid because both families consented खThe marriage becomes void only if the girl complains गThe marriage is void and those responsible are punishable घThe marriage is valid because the man is above 20
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

233. Principle: A person is bound to maintain his parents who are aged and unable to maintain themselves. Facts: A well-earning son refuses to give any support to his elderly parents, who have no income or property. The parents claim maintenance. Decide.

     कThe son has no duty once he has his own family खThe son must pay only if he lives with them गThe parents can claim only from the State घThe son must provide maintenance to his parents
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

234. Principle: 'Once a mortgage, always a mortgage': a mortgagor's right to redeem the mortgaged property on paying the debt cannot be taken away by any term of the mortgage. Facts: A mortgage deed states that if the loan is not repaid within one year, the property will belong to the lender forever and the borrower will lose all right to redeem it. The borrower tenders the full amount with interest after fifteen months. Decide.

     कThe borrower loses the property but gets back the interest paid खThe borrower must pay double the loan to redeem गThe borrower can still redeem the property, as the clause is void घThe lender has become owner of the property
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

235. Principle: When land is transferred and the transferred part cannot be reached except through the transferor's remaining land, the transferee acquires a right of way of necessity over that land. Facts: A sells the inner part of his plot to B. The only access to B's part is through A's remaining land. A later builds a wall blocking the way. Decide.

     कB must buy another plot to reach his land खB is entitled to a right of way through A's land गA may block the way because it is his land घB may use the way only if he pays A daily rent
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

236. Principle: Whatever is permanently attached to the land forms part of the land and passes with it on sale, unless otherwise agreed. Facts: A sells his land with a house to B without any reservation. After the sale, A comes back to remove the mango trees and the brick boundary wall. Decide.

     कThe trees and wall belong to B, and A cannot remove them खA may remove the trees and wall, since he built and planted them गB must pay A extra for the trees and wall घA may remove the trees but not the wall
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

237. Principle: A person who has not been heard of for seven years by those who would naturally have heard of him if he were alive is presumed to be dead. Facts: R left his village and has not contacted his family or anyone who knows him for nine years. His wife applies to have his share of family property transferred. Decide.

     कR must be presumed alive until his body is found खR may be presumed dead गR can be presumed dead only after twenty years घThe question cannot be decided without R's consent
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

238. Principle: Leading questions must not be asked in examination-in-chief if the opposite party objects, but they may be asked in cross-examination. Facts: While cross-examining a prosecution witness, the defence lawyer asks, 'You had been drinking that night, hadn't you?' The prosecutor objects that it is a leading question. Decide.

     कThe question must be disallowed, as leading questions are never allowed खThe witness may refuse to answer any leading question गThe question is allowed only if the judge asks it घThe question is allowed, since it is asked in cross-examination
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

239. Principle: Statements and facts that form part of the same transaction as the fact in issue are relevant, even if they would otherwise be hearsay. Facts: Seconds after being stabbed, Y shouts, 'A has stabbed me!' A passer-by who heard the shout is called as a witness. Decide.

     कThe passer-by's evidence of the shout is admissible as part of the same transaction खThe evidence is admissible only if A confesses गThe evidence is inadmissible hearsay घThe evidence is admissible only if Y has died
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

240. Principle: When a court has to form an opinion on a point of science, art or identity of handwriting, the opinions of persons specially skilled in that field are relevant. Facts: In a dispute over whether a signature on a deed is forged, a handwriting expert compares it with admitted signatures and gives his opinion. Decide.

     कThe opinion is inadmissible, as only eyewitnesses may testify खThe opinion is binding on the court गThe expert's opinion is relevant evidence घThe opinion is admissible only if both parties agree
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।