Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

621. The legal maxim 'Ignorantia juris non excusat' means:

     कIgnorance of fact is an excuse खNo one should be a judge in his own cause गIgnorance of the law is no excuse घLet the buyer beware
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

622. Principle: A person cannot accept an offer of which he has no knowledge. Facts: X announces a reward for finding his lost dog. Y, unaware of the announcement, finds and returns the dog, and learns of the reward later. Decide.

     कY is entitled to the reward. खY is entitled to half the reward. गY is not entitled to the reward. घX must pay double the reward.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

623. Principle: An agreement with a minor is void. Facts: Ram, aged 15, borrows Rs. 50,000 from Shyam by signing an agreement and fails to repay. Decide.

     कThe agreement is valid and Ram must repay. खThe agreement is void and cannot be enforced against Ram. गThe agreement becomes valid when Ram turns 18. घRam must repay double as a penalty.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

624. Principle: A person who voluntarily accepts a known risk cannot claim damages for harm arising from that risk. Facts: A spectator at a cricket match is hit by a ball struck during normal play. Decide.

     कThe batsman must pay damages. खThe organisers must pay damages in every case. गThe bowler is liable for bowling the ball. घThe spectator cannot claim damages.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

625. Principle: A person who fails to take reasonable care owed to another and thereby causes harm is liable for negligence. Facts: A surgeon leaves a cotton sponge inside a patient's abdomen after an operation, causing infection. Decide.

     कThe surgeon is liable for negligence. खThe surgeon is not liable because the operation succeeded. गThe hospital alone is liable, not the surgeon. घThe patient is liable for consenting to surgery.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।