Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

141. Principle: Where there are threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing measures to prevent it. Facts: Experts warn that a proposed quarry near a river may cause serious and irreversible landslides, though the evidence is not yet conclusive. The company argues that no action can be taken until the danger is proved with certainty. Decide.

     कNo action can be taken until the danger is scientifically proved खThe company may continue without any conditions गOnly the people living nearby may decide घThe authorities may take preventive measures now despite the uncertainty
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

142. Principle: The person who causes pollution must bear the cost of preventing it and of restoring the damaged environment. Facts: A tannery discharges untreated effluent into a river, damaging farmland downstream. The tannery argues that it has paid its taxes and owes nothing more. Decide.

     कThe tannery must pay for restoring the environment and compensating the victims खThe tannery owes nothing, because it has paid its taxes गThe government must bear the cost of restoration घOnly the farmers must bear the loss
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

143. Principle: In deciding custody of a child, the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration. Facts: The divorced parents of a 6-year-old both seek custody. The father is wealthier, but the court finds that the mother has been the child's main caregiver and the child is well settled with her. Decide.

     कThe court is likely to give custody to the mother, because it best serves the child's welfare खThe father must get custody, because he is wealthier गThe father must get custody, because fathers are natural guardians in all cases घThe child must be placed in a hostel
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

144. Principle: A person who intentionally kills another is disqualified from inheriting the property of the person killed. Facts: To get his father's property quickly, A murders his father and is convicted. A then claims his share of the father's property as an heir. Decide.

     कA inherits, because he is a legal heir खA inherits after serving his sentence गA inherits half of his normal share घA is disqualified from inheriting his father's property
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

145. Principle: The chance of an heir-apparent succeeding to an estate (a mere expectancy) cannot be transferred. Facts: While his father is alive, A sells to B the share of his father's land that he expects to inherit. Decide.

     कThe sale is valid, because A will certainly inherit खThe sale is valid if the father consents later गThe sale is void, because a mere chance of inheritance cannot be transferred घThe sale is valid only for half of the expected share
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

146. Principle: Where property is transferred subject to a condition absolutely restraining the transferee from disposing of it, the condition is void but the transfer is valid. Facts: A sells land to B on the condition that B shall never sell, mortgage or gift the land to anyone. Later B sells it to C. A challenges the sale. Decide.

     कThe sale to C is void, because B broke the condition खThe sale to C is valid, because the absolute restraint is void गThe land goes back to A घB must pay A compensation for breaking the condition
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

147. Principle: A gift of future property, that is, property not yet in existence or not yet owned by the donor, is void. Facts: A executes a gift deed stating that he gives to B the paddy crop he will grow on his land next year. Decide.

     कThe gift is valid, because it is made by deed खThe gift is valid once the paddy is harvested गThe gift is valid if B accepts it now घThe gift is void, because it relates to future property
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

148. Principle: A person who is arrested must be informed of the grounds of the arrest as soon as possible. Facts: Police arrest A at his house and keep him in custody for three days without telling him why he has been arrested. Decide.

     कNo right is violated, because the police may arrest anyone खNo right is violated if A is later charged गA's right has been violated घA's right is violated only if he asked for the reason in writing
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

149. Principle: An administrative decision based on irrelevant considerations is invalid. Facts: A district office refuses to renew a shop licence solely because the shop owner is a member of an opposition political party, though he fulfils all legal requirements. Decide.

     कThe refusal is valid, because the office has discretion खThe refusal is valid if the party is small गThe refusal is invalid, because it is based on an irrelevant consideration घThe refusal is invalid only if the shop has been running for ten years
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

150. Principle: The right of private defence is not available to a person who himself began the attack and thereby created the need for defence. Facts: A starts a fight by attacking B with a stick. B wrests the stick away and hits back. A then stabs B, claiming that he was defending himself against B's blows. Decide.

     कA can claim private defence, because B hit him खA can claim private defence, because B took away his stick गA is not liable, because both of them were fighting घA cannot claim private defence, because he was the aggressor who started the fight
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।