Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

261. Principle: Except for murder and certain offences against the State, nothing is an offence that is done by a person compelled by threats that reasonably cause apprehension of instant death. Facts: Robbers hold a gun to A's head and force him to drive their getaway vehicle. Decide.

     कA is guilty because he could have refused खA is not guilty, as he acted under threat of instant death गA is guilty of robbery along with the robbers घA is guilty of abetment of robbery
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

262. Principle: If an offence is committed by any member of an unlawful assembly in prosecution of its common object, every person who is a member of that assembly at the time is guilty of that offence. Facts: Seven people gather with the common object of beating Y. Six of them beat Y; the seventh, X, stands with them throughout sharing the object but does not strike. Decide.

     कX is not guilty, since he did not strike Y खX is guilty only of being present at the scene गOnly the person who struck the first blow is guilty घX is guilty along with the others
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

263. Principle: Wrongfully restraining a person so as to prevent him from going beyond certain limits is wrongful confinement. Facts: A locks B inside a room for six hours so that B cannot attend a meeting. Decide.

     कA has committed wrongful confinement खA has committed kidnapping गA has committed only wrongful restraint घA has committed no offence, as B was not hurt
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

264. Principle: Whoever threatens another with injury to his person, reputation or property, intending to make him do an act he is not legally bound to do or omit an act he is legally entitled to do, commits criminal intimidation. Facts: A threatens to burn down B's house unless B withdraws a lawful case he has filed against A. Decide.

     कA has committed no offence, as no house was burnt खA has committed arson गA has committed criminal intimidation घA has committed extortion
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

265. Principle: Whoever, intending to cause wrongful loss to another, destroys or damages property commits mischief. Facts: Angry with his neighbour, A poisons the neighbour's cow, which dies. Decide.

     कA has committed theft खA has committed no offence, as a cow is an animal and not property गA is only liable to apologise घA has committed mischief
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

266. Principle: When five or more persons conjointly commit or attempt robbery, or aid it by being present, the offence is dacoity. Facts: Four armed men rob a jewellery shop while a fifth man stands guard outside the shop to warn them of police. Decide.

     कThe offence is only theft, since no one was killed खThe fifth man has committed no offence गAll five have committed dacoity घOnly the four men inside have committed robbery
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

267. Principle: The owner of a vehicle is not vicariously liable for the negligence of a friend who borrows it and drives it for the friend's own purposes. Facts: A lends his car to his friend B so that B can visit his relatives. B drives negligently and injures C. C sues A. Decide.

     कA and B are equally liable खA is not liable, because B was driving for his own purpose गA is liable because he chose to lend the car घA is liable as owner of the car
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

268. Principle: An occupier may cut off the branches of a neighbour's tree that overhang his land, without notice, provided he does so without entering the neighbour's land. Facts: Branches of A's mango tree hang over B's land. Standing on his own land, B cuts off only the overhanging branches. A sues B. Decide.

     कB's act is lawful abatement of a nuisance खB is liable because he did not give notice गB is liable for trespass to A's tree घB must pay A the value of the mangoes on those branches
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

269. Principle: A communication between husband and wife is not a publication for the purposes of defamation. Facts: At home, A tells his wife that their neighbour B is a cheat. No one else hears it. B learns of it and sues A for defamation. Decide.

     कA is liable, as the words were false खA is not liable, as there was no publication गA's wife is liable for listening घA is liable, as his wife is a third person
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

270. Principle: Where defamatory words refer to a large class of persons, an individual member cannot sue unless the words can be understood to refer to him personally. Facts: A writes in a newspaper that 'all lawyers are thieves'. Lawyer L sues A for defamation. Decide.

     कL succeeds only if he is a senior advocate खEvery lawyer in the country may jointly recover damages गL succeeds, as he is a lawyer घL's suit fails, as the words refer to a large class and not to him personally
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।