व्यावसायिक कानुन – Business & Corporate Law MCQ
व्यावसायिक कानुन – CA / ACCA
Business & Corporate Law · Chartered Accountancy (CA, ACCA) · ४०९ प्रश्न
४०९ प्रश्न उपलब्ध। मोड छान्नुहोस्:
व्यावसायिक कानुन: प्रश्न र उत्तर
सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।
सही: ० / ०
-
Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd (1960), in which chocolate wrappers formed part of the consideration, shows that consideration:
सही उत्तर: ख) Must be sufficient but need not be adequate
The courts will not assess whether a bargain is a good one. Something of some value in law, even worthless wrappers, can be sufficient consideration.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Re McArdle (1951) is authority for the rule that:
सही उत्तर: ग) Past consideration is not good consideration
Work was done on a house before the promise to pay for it, so the promise was not supported by consideration. Lampleigh v Braithwait is the main exception, where the act was done at the promisor's request.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
The classic definition of consideration as 'some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other' comes from:
सही उत्तर: ग) Currie v Misa (1875)
Currie v Misa gave this benefit and detriment definition. Chappell v Nestle concerns the adequacy and sufficiency of consideration, not its definition.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Balfour v Balfour (1919) is authority for the presumption that:
सही उत्तर: ग) Domestic agreements between spouses are not intended to create legal relations
The husband's promise of a monthly allowance to his wife was a domestic arrangement without intention to create legal relations. In commercial agreements the presumption is the opposite.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
An offeror promises to keep an offer open for 7 days but no consideration is given for that promise. Following Routledge v Grant (1828), the offeror:
सही उत्तर: ख) May revoke the offer at any time before acceptance
A promise to keep an offer open is not binding unless supported by consideration, which would create an option contract. Revocation must still be communicated before acceptance.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
In Dickinson v Dodds (1876), it was held that an offer may be revoked:
सही उत्तर: ग) By communication through a reliable third party
The offeree learned from a reliable third party that the property had been sold to someone else. This was effective notice of revocation, so his later acceptance was too late.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation (1955) held that, for instantaneous communications such as telex, acceptance is complete:
सही उत्तर: घ) When it is received by the offeror
The postal rule does not apply to instantaneous methods; acceptance must reach the offeror. The contract is therefore formed where the acceptance is received.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Byrne & Co v Van Tienhoven (1880) held that a revocation of an offer sent by post takes effect:
सही उत्तर: क) Only when it is actually received by the offeree
Revocation must be communicated, so it operates only on receipt. Here the acceptance was posted before the revocation arrived, so a contract existed.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Under the postal rule established in Adams v Lindsell (1818), an acceptance sent by post is complete when:
सही उत्तर: ग) The letter is properly posted
Where post is a reasonable means of acceptance, acceptance takes effect on posting, even if the letter is delayed or lost. The postal rule does not apply to revocation of an offer.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Felthouse v Bindley (1862) is authority for the rule that:
सही उत्तर: ख) Silence of the offeree cannot amount to acceptance
The uncle said he would take the horse unless he heard otherwise, but the nephew's silence was not acceptance. An offeror cannot force a contract on an offeree by treating silence as consent.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
यी अभ्यास प्रश्न हुन्, आधिकारिक प्रश्न होइनन्। पाठ्यक्रम, विज्ञापन र नतिजाका लागि सम्बन्धित निकायको आधिकारिक वेबसाइट हेर्नुहोस्। उत्तरमा गल्ती भेटे प्रश्नमुनिको "टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट" मा लेख्नुहोस्।
नमस्ते! पाठ्यक्रम, सामान्य ज्ञान, भाषा परीक्षा वा कुनै प्रश्नको उत्तर बुझ्न सोध्नुहोस्।
AI ले गल्ती गर्न सक्छ। महत्वपूर्ण कुरा आधिकारिक स्रोतमा जाँच्नुहोस्।