व्यावसायिक कानुन – Business & Corporate Law MCQ

व्यावसायिक कानुन: प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

281. A sum fixed in a contract as a genuine pre-estimate of the loss likely to result from a breach is called:

     कA penalty खNominal damages गLiquidated damages घExemplary damages
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

282. Under the rule in Hadley v Baxendale, damages for breach of contract are recoverable for losses that:

     कAre caused in any way, however remote खThe claimant alone foresaw गArise only from physical damage to goods घArise naturally from the breach or were in the reasonable contemplation of both parties when contracting
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

283. Before the date fixed for performance, one party clearly states that he will not perform the contract. Following Hochster v De la Tour, the other party:

     कMust wait until the due date before taking action खCan only claim the contract is void गLoses all remedies घMay sue for breach immediately without waiting for the due date
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

284. In Krell v Henry, a flat was hired to watch the coronation procession, which was cancelled. The hirer was excused from paying because:

     कThe flat had been destroyed खThe foundation of the contract (its very purpose) had failed गThe owner had misrepresented the view घThe hirer was a minor
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

285. A music hall hired for concerts was destroyed by fire before the concert dates, through no fault of either party. In Taylor v Caldwell the contract was held to be:

     कBreached by the owner, who must pay damages खStill enforceable at a later date गDischarged by frustration (supervening impossibility) घVoid from the beginning for mistake
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

286. An agreement between two persons to pay money depending on the result of a cricket match in which neither has any other interest is:

     कA contingent contract enforceable by law खA quasi-contract गA wagering agreement, which is void घA contract of indemnity
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

287. A contract to do or not to do something if some event, collateral to the contract, does or does not happen (e.g. an insurance contract) is a:

     कContingent contract खQuasi-contract गWagering agreement घVoid agreement
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

288. A shopkeeper sells the goodwill of his business and agrees not to carry on a similar business within the local area for a reasonable period. This restraint is generally:

     कVoid as a restraint of trade in all cases खValid, as a recognised exception for the sale of goodwill गIllegal and punishable घValid only if the restraint is for life
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

289. Where, unknown to both parties, the goods that are the subject matter of a sale had already perished at the time of the contract (as in Couturier v Hastie), the agreement is:

     कValid, and the seller must pay damages खVoidable at the buyer's option गVoid घValid, and the risk passes to the buyer
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

290. In Raffles v Wichelhaus, the contract concerned cotton arriving on a ship named 'Peerless', but there were two such ships and each party meant a different one. The contract was:

     कVoid, because there was no consensus ad idem खValid, with the buyer's meaning prevailing गValid, with the seller's meaning prevailing घVoidable for misrepresentation
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।