चार्टर्ड एकाउन्टेन्सी CA (CAP I, II, III) र ACCA तयारी

CA / ACCA: प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

3361. A contract clause fixing the sum payable on breach as a genuine pre-estimate of the likely loss is treated as:

      कA condition precedent खAn exclusion clause गLiquidated damages, which are enforceable घA penalty, which is unenforceable
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3362. Hadley v Baxendale (1854) is the leading case on:

      कPromissory estoppel खRemoteness of damage in contract गCapacity of minors घOffer and acceptance
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3363. Hochster v De la Tour (1853) is authority that, where a party says before performance is due that it will not perform:

      कThe innocent party may sue for breach immediately खThe contract becomes void automatically गThe innocent party can claim only nominal damages घThe innocent party must wait until the date of performance
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3364. Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC (1956) established that a contract is NOT frustrated merely because:

      कPerformance has become illegal खPerformance has become more expensive or difficult than expected गA party essential to personal performance has died घThe subject matter has been destroyed
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3365. In Krell v Henry (1903), a room was hired to view a coronation procession that was then cancelled. The contract was:

      कVoidable for misrepresentation खValid, and the full rent was payable गFrustrated because its foundation had failed घVoid for mistake
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3366. Taylor v Caldwell (1863), where a music hall was destroyed by fire before the concerts, is an example of:

      कCommon mistake खFrustration due to destruction of the subject matter गMisrepresentation घAnticipatory breach
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3367. In Phillips v Brooks (1919), a rogue posing as Sir George Bullough bought a ring face to face. The contract was held to be:

      कVoid for mistake as to identity खValid and not open to challenge गVoidable for fraud, not void for mistake घFrustrated
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3368. Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864), involving two ships named 'Peerless', is an example of:

      कMutual mistake, so there was no agreement (no consensus ad idem) खAnticipatory breach गFraudulent misrepresentation घFrustration
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3369. In Couturier v Hastie (1856), the cargo of corn had already been sold and disposed of before the contract was made. The contract was:

      कVoid for common mistake as to the existence of the subject matter खValid, and the buyer had to pay गVoidable for misrepresentation घFrustrated
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

3370. In which type of contract is there a positive duty to disclose all material facts (uberrimae fidei)?

      कInsurance contract खContract of employment गContract for hire of a car घSale of goods contract
      💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

      छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

      पठाउनुहोस्

      टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।