Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

341. Principle: Rules made by an executive authority under an Act must stay within the powers conferred by that Act; rules beyond those powers are ultra vires and void. Facts: An Act authorises a ministry to fix licence fees. The ministry makes a rule providing imprisonment for anyone who delays paying the fee. Decide.

     कThe rule makes the whole Act void खThe rule is valid, as it helps collect fees गThe rule is valid until challenged by Parliament घThe rule on imprisonment is ultra vires and void
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

342. Principle: If only part of a law is unconstitutional and that part can be separated from the rest, only that part is void. Facts: An Act has ten sections. The Supreme Court finds that one section violates fundamental rights and that the rest of the Act can work without it. Decide.

     कOnly the offending section is void खThe whole Act is void गThe Act is suspended until Parliament amends it घThe whole Act remains valid
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

343. Principle: Whoever dishonestly receives stolen property, knowing or having reason to believe it to be stolen, commits an offence. Facts: Late at night, a stranger offers A a new mobile phone worth Rs. 80,000 for Rs. 2,000, saying he 'picked it up' from a parked car. A buys it. Decide.

     कA is not guilty, as he did not steal it himself खA is guilty of dishonestly receiving stolen property गA becomes the lawful owner of the phone घA is not guilty, as he paid for the phone
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

344. Principle: Entering property in another's possession with intent to commit an offence, or to intimidate, insult or annoy the person in possession, is criminal trespass. Facts: A enters B's house without permission with the intention of insulting B in front of his family. Decide.

     कA has committed house-breaking by night खA has committed no offence, as he caused no damage गA has committed criminal trespass घA has committed only civil trespass
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

345. Principle: A person cheats by personation if he cheats by pretending to be some other person. Facts: A appears in a public service examination in place of B, pretending to be B, so that B may get the job. Decide.

     कOnly B has committed an offence खA has committed criminal breach of trust गA has committed cheating by personation घA has committed no offence, as he did not gain anything
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

346. Principle: Making a false document with intent to cause damage or to commit fraud is forgery. Facts: Without authority, A signs B's name on B's cheque and presents it at the bank to withdraw B's money. Decide.

     कA has committed extortion खA has committed no offence until he receives the money गA has committed only criminal trespass घA has committed forgery
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

347. Principle: Whoever intentionally aids, by any act, the commission of an offence abets that offence. Facts: Knowing that B intends to kill C, A gives B his gun for the purpose. B shoots and kills C. Decide.

     कA is guilty of abetment of murder खA is guilty only of illegally lending a gun गA is not guilty, as he did not shoot घOnly B is guilty, and A has no liability
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

348. Principle: Certain public-welfare offences, such as selling adulterated food, are complete without proof of guilty intention or knowledge. Facts: A shopkeeper sells ghee that turns out to be adulterated. He proves he did not know about the adulteration. Decide.

     कThe shopkeeper is liable only in civil law खThe shopkeeper is liable गOnly the manufacturer can be liable घThe shopkeeper is not liable, as he lacked knowledge
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

349. Principle: A confession made to a police officer cannot be proved against the accused. Facts: While in police custody, A confesses to the investigating inspector that he committed the burglary. The prosecution seeks to prove this confession at trial. Decide.

     कThe confession is admissible, as it was made voluntarily खThe confession cannot be proved against A गThe confession is admissible if the inspector testifies घThe confession is conclusive proof of guilt
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

350. Principle: A witness may give evidence only of facts he personally perceived; what someone else told him, offered to prove the truth of that statement, is hearsay and inadmissible. Facts: In a theft trial, W testifies that his neighbour told him she saw A take the money. The neighbour is not called as a witness. Decide.

     कW's testimony is admissible, as he heard it directly खThe neighbour's statement is a dying declaration गW's testimony on this point is inadmissible hearsay घW's testimony is conclusive proof of guilt
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।