Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

391. Principle: A person to whom money has been paid by mistake must repay it. Facts: Through a bank error, Rs. 2 lakh meant for another customer is credited to Sita's account. She withdraws and spends it, knowing it is not hers. Decide.

     कSita need repay only half the money खSita must repay the money गSita may keep the money, as the bank made the error घOnly the bank's employee is liable to repay
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

392. Principle: Where a person lawfully delivers goods to another without intending to do so gratuitously, and the other enjoys the benefit, the latter must pay for them. Facts: By mistake, a shop delivers a sack of sugar to Shyam's house. Shyam knows it is not a gift but uses all the sugar. Decide.

     कThe shop must bear the loss for its mistake खShyam need not pay, as he did not order it गShyam must pay for the sugar घShyam must return an equal quantity of rice
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

393. Principle: A misrepresentation, even if made innocently, makes a contract voidable at the option of the party misled. Facts: Believing it honestly, A tells B that his land never floods. B buys the land, which floods in the first monsoon. A proves he genuinely believed his statement. Decide.

     कThe contract is void from the beginning खB has no remedy because A was honest गB may rescind the contract, though A acted honestly घA is guilty of fraud and must be punished
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

394. Principle: Consideration may move from the promisee or from any other person, so a beneficiary who did not personally give consideration may still enforce the promise if it was made for his benefit. Facts: A gifts her property to her brother B on the condition, accepted by B, that he pays their sister C Rs. 5,000 every year. B stops paying and argues C gave him no consideration. Decide.

     कOnly A's heirs can sue B खC cannot sue, as she gave no consideration गThe gift becomes void and the property returns to A घC can enforce the promise, as consideration moved from A
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

395. Principle: An agreement to which the consent of the promisor is freely given is not void merely because the consideration is inadequate. Facts: Without any pressure or fraud, A agrees to sell his horse, worth Rs. 1 lakh, to B for Rs. 10,000. Later A regrets and argues the contract is void for inadequate consideration. Decide.

     कThe contract is valid, as A consented freely खThe contract is voidable at A's option गB must pay the full value of Rs. 1 lakh घThe contract is void for inadequate consideration
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

396. Principle: When two parties make identical offers to each other in ignorance of each other's offer, neither offer has been accepted and no contract arises. Facts: On the same day, without knowing of the other's letter, A writes offering to sell his rice to B for Rs. 50,000 and B writes offering to buy the same rice from A for Rs. 50,000. Decide.

     कA contract arises, as the terms are identical खNo contract arises, as neither offer was accepted गA contract arises, but only for half the quantity घA contract arises on the date the first letter was posted
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

397. Principle: An offer lapses on the death of the offeror if the fact of his death comes to the knowledge of the offeree before acceptance. Facts: A offers to sell his house to B. Before B accepts, A dies, and B learns of A's death. B then sends his acceptance to A's address. Decide.

     कThere is a binding contract with A's heirs खThere is no contract, as the offer lapsed before acceptance गB can compel A's heirs to sell the house घThe contract is valid but voidable by A's heirs
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

398. Principle: An offer lapses if it is not accepted within the time prescribed by the offeror. Facts: On Monday, A offers to sell his land to B and says the offer will remain open until Friday. B sends his acceptance the following Monday. Decide.

     कThe contract is voidable at A's option खThere is a valid contract, as B accepted the offer गThere is no contract, as the offer had lapsed घA must sell the land because B had accepted in writing
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

399. Principle: At an auction, each bid is an offer, and the sale is complete only when the auctioneer announces it by the fall of the hammer; until then a bidder may withdraw his bid. Facts: Ram makes the highest bid for a tractor but withdraws it before the hammer falls. The auctioneer claims Ram is bound. Decide.

     कRam is bound, because an auction bid cannot be withdrawn खRam is bound, as his bid was the highest गRam must pay half the bid amount as compensation घRam is not bound, as he withdrew his offer before acceptance
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

400. Principle: Display of goods in a shop with price tags is only an invitation to make an offer; the customer makes the offer, which the shopkeeper may accept or reject. Facts: A shirt worth Rs. 3,000 is wrongly tagged Rs. 300. Hari takes it to the counter and offers Rs. 300, but the shopkeeper refuses to sell. Decide.

     कThere is no contract, as the shopkeeper never accepted Hari's offer खThe shopkeeper must sell the shirt for Rs. 300 गThe shopkeeper must sell the shirt for Rs. 3,000 घHari can sue the shopkeeper for breach of contract
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।