Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

91. Principle: A minor may be admitted to the benefits of a partnership, but he is not personally liable for the firm's debts; only his share in the firm's property is liable. Facts: M, aged 16, is admitted to the benefits of a firm. The firm incurs heavy debts, and the creditors seek to recover them from M's personal house inherited from his grandfather. Decide.

    कM's share in the firm is also free from liability खM's house can be sold to pay the firm's debts गM is fully liable like an adult partner घThe creditors cannot reach M's personal house; only his share in the firm is liable
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

92. Principle: A partner who retires from a firm remains liable to third parties for acts of the firm done after his retirement, until public notice of the retirement is given. Facts: P retires from a firm, but no public notice is given. A month later the firm buys goods on credit from Q, who knew P as a partner and did not know of his retirement. The firm fails to pay. Can Q hold P liable?

    कYes, but only if P agreed to the purchase खNo, because P had already retired गNo, because P did not personally sign for the goods घYes, because no public notice of P's retirement was given
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

93. Principle: An agent must conduct the business of his principal according to the principal's directions; if he departs from them, he must make good any resulting loss. Facts: A instructs his agent B to sell his shares only if the price reaches Rs. 900 per share. B sells them at Rs. 700 without consulting A, and the price later rises above Rs. 900. Decide.

    कB is not liable, since he acted in good faith खB must compensate A for the loss caused by disobeying his instructions गA cannot complain, because an agent may decide the price घThe buyer must return the shares to A for free
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

94. Principle: A bailee who takes as much care of the goods as a person of ordinary prudence would take of his own goods is not responsible for their loss. Facts: B keeps A's motorcycle, left with him for safe custody, in his locked garage along with his own vehicles. Armed robbers break the lock at night and take away all the vehicles, including B's own. Is B liable to A?

    कNo, but only because A did not pay any charge खYes, because a bailee is liable for every loss गYes, because B should have kept the motorcycle in a bank घNo, because B took the care an ordinary prudent person would take
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

95. Principle: A bailee who has, in accordance with the purpose of the bailment, rendered services involving labour or skill on the goods may retain them until he is paid for those services. Facts: Sita gives cloth to a tailor to stitch a suit. The tailor stitches it, but Sita refuses to pay the agreed charge and demands the suit. Decide.

    कThe tailor must hand over the suit immediately and sue for the charge खThe tailor may retain the suit until he is paid गThe tailor becomes the owner of the cloth घThe tailor may sell the suit at once without notice
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

96. Principle: A continuing guarantee may be revoked by the surety, as regards future transactions, by giving notice to the creditor. Facts: C guarantees payment for all rice that a wholesaler supplies to D from month to month. In June, C gives written notice to the wholesaler revoking the guarantee. The wholesaler continues to supply D, and D fails to pay for rice supplied in July. Is C liable for the July supplies?

    कYes, because a guarantee can never be revoked खNo, because the guarantee was revoked for transactions after the notice गYes, because the wholesaler did not agree to the revocation घNo, and C is also free from liability for supplies made before June
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

97. Principle: A pledge made by a person who has possession of goods under a voidable contract, before the contract is rescinded, gives the pawnee a good title if he acts in good faith and without notice of the defect. Facts: A obtains a gold chain from B by fraud. Before B rescinds the contract, A pledges the chain with C, a pawnbroker who knows nothing of the fraud, for a loan. B now demands the chain from C without repaying the loan. Decide.

    कThe pledge is void because A had committed fraud खB can take the chain back from C without paying anything गC must hand the chain to the police घC may keep the chain until his loan is repaid, as he took it in good faith before rescission
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

98. Principle: A person who signs a contractual document is ordinarily bound by its terms, whether or not he has read them, unless his signature was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation. Facts: Ram signs a printed hire-purchase agreement for a motorcycle without reading it. The agreement allows the dealer to repossess the motorcycle if two instalments are missed. Ram misses two instalments and the dealer repossesses it. Ram argues he never read that clause. Decide.

    कThe whole agreement is void because it was printed खRam is not bound, as he did not read the clause गRam is bound by the clause, as he signed the agreement and there was no fraud घThe dealer must return the motorcycle and pay compensation
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

99. Principle: A contract is not voidable merely because one party was mistaken about a matter of fact, if the other party neither caused nor knew of the mistake. Facts: Hari buys an old painting from Shyam for Rs. 5 lakh, privately believing it to be the work of a famous artist. Shyam made no statement about the painter. It later turns out to be the work of an unknown painter. Can Hari avoid the contract?

    कYes, because a mistake about the painter makes every sale void खNo, because it was Hari's own unilateral mistake, not caused by Shyam गYes, because Shyam received too high a price घNo, because paintings can never be returned
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

100. Principle: When an offeree rejects an offer, the offer comes to an end; a later attempt to accept it is only a fresh offer. Facts: A offers to sell his tractor to B for Rs. 8 lakh. B replies, 'I reject your offer.' Two days later B writes, 'I now accept your offer of Rs. 8 lakh.' A has meanwhile lost interest. Is there a contract?

     कYes, because B finally accepted the same price खNo, because B's rejection ended the offer and his later letter is only a new offer गYes, because A did not withdraw the offer in writing घNo, because a tractor cannot be sold by letter
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।