Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

71. Principle: Whoever voluntarily obstructs a person so as to prevent him from proceeding in any direction in which he has a right to proceed commits wrongful restraint. Facts: A stands in the middle of a narrow public lane with a stick and refuses to let B pass along it to reach the market, though B could go back the way he came. Decide.

    कA has committed criminal trespass खA has committed wrongful confinement गA has committed no offence, as B could go back घA has committed wrongful restraint
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

72. Principle: A person may commit theft even of his own property if he dishonestly takes it out of the possession of a person who lawfully holds it. Facts: A pledges his watch with B, a moneylender, as security for a loan. Without repaying the loan and without B's consent, A secretly takes the watch away from B's shop. Decide.

    कA has committed theft, even though he owns the watch खA has committed no offence, as the watch is his own गA has committed only a civil wrong of breach of contract घB has committed criminal misappropriation
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

73. Principle: No communication made in good faith is an offence by reason of any harm to the person to whom it is made, if it is made for that person's benefit. Facts: A surgeon, in good faith and for the patient's benefit, tells a patient that his illness is incurable and that he should arrange his affairs. The patient dies of shock. Decide.

    कThe surgeon is guilty of criminal intimidation खThe surgeon is guilty of culpable homicide गThe surgeon is guilty of causing death by negligence घThe surgeon has committed no offence
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

74. Principle: Nothing is an offence by reason that it causes, or is intended to cause, harm so slight that no person of ordinary sense and temper would complain of it. Facts: While waiting in a government office, A takes one sheet of blank paper from the office table to write down a phone number. He is charged with theft. Decide.

    कA is guilty of criminal breach of trust खA is guilty of theft and must be punished गA should be excused, as the harm is too trivial to be an offence घA is guilty of robbery
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

75. Principle: Nothing is an offence merely because it is done with knowledge that it is likely to cause harm, if it is done without criminal intention, in good faith, to prevent or avoid other harm to person or property. Facts: The captain of a boat, through no fault of his own, finds that he cannot stop in time to avoid either running down a small boat with 20 passengers or a smaller one with 2 passengers. Without intending harm, he steers towards the boat with 2 passengers to save the larger one. Decide.

    कHe commits no offence, as he acted in good faith to avoid greater harm खHe is guilty of murder गHe is guilty of attempt to murder घHe is guilty only if the passengers of the small boat are injured
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

76. Principle: Whoever, being legally bound by an oath to state the truth, makes a statement that is false and that he knows or believes to be false, gives false evidence. Facts: In a theft trial, witness W states on oath that he saw the accused in the market at the time of the theft, although W knows the accused was at home. Decide.

    कW has committed no offence, as he only helped the accused खW has given false evidence गW has committed criminal breach of trust घW can be punished only if the accused is convicted
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

77. Principle: Whoever, by force or by any deceitful means, compels or induces a person to go from any place commits abduction. Facts: A falsely tells B, an adult woman, that her mother is seriously ill in hospital in another town, and so induces B to travel there with him. Decide.

    कA has committed abduction खA has committed kidnapping from lawful guardianship गA has committed no offence, as B went voluntarily घA has committed only criminal trespass
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

78. Principle: An occupier of land may detain animals that stray onto his land and cause damage there, until compensation for the damage is paid. Facts: B's goats stray into A's vegetable field and eat the crop. A keeps the goats in his shed and asks B to pay for the damaged crop before taking them back. Decide.

    कA may lawfully detain the goats until compensation is paid खA is guilty of theft of the goats गA must release the goats at once and sue separately घA becomes the owner of the goats
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

79. Principle: The State is liable for the torts of its employees committed in the course of non-sovereign, commercial activities, in the same way as a private employer. Facts: A bus run by a government transport undertaking for paying passengers hits a pedestrian because of the driver's negligence. Decide.

    कOnly the driver personally can be sued खThe State is immune because it owns the bus गThe government undertaking is liable to compensate the pedestrian घThe pedestrian must claim from the bus passengers
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

80. Principle: A person in wrongful possession of land is liable to the rightful owner for the profits he received, or could with ordinary diligence have received, during that possession (mesne profits). Facts: A wrongfully occupies B's orchard for three years and sells its fruit. The court later declares B the owner. What further relief can B claim?

    कMesne profits for the three years of wrongful possession खOnly the return of the land, without any profits गA share of the fruit for the current year only घNothing, because A looked after the trees
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।