Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

21. The maxim 'Communis error facit jus' means:

    कA common right belongs to everyone खA common law prevents error गAn error of law is no excuse घA common error makes law
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

22. The maxim 'Cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex' means:

    कWhen a judge retires, his judgments cease to bind खA later law repeals an earlier law गThe law ceases to apply to those who are ignorant of it घWhen the reason for a law ceases, the law itself ceases
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

23. The maxim 'Res inter alios acta alteri nocere non debet' means:

    कA transaction between other persons should not prejudice a person who was not a party to it खA thing done by many is a thing done by all गActs of others are binding on everyone घA matter decided between others is final for all
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

24. The maxim 'Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa' means:

    कNo one can be punished without a law खNo one should be a judge in his own cause गNo one can give what he does not have घNo one should be vexed twice for one and the same cause
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

25. The maxim 'Rex non potest peccare', which historically gave the Crown immunity from suits in tort, means:

    कThe King's word is law खThe King is above the courts but below the law गNo one may judge the King's ministers घThe King can do no wrong
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

26. Principle: A person who knowingly makes a false statement to induce another to enter a contract cannot defend himself by saying that the other party could have discovered the truth. Facts: A, selling his shop, tells B that its monthly sales are Rs. 3 lakh, knowing they are only Rs. 50,000. B could have checked the books but relies on A's word and buys the shop. On discovering the truth, B seeks to avoid the contract, and A argues that B should have checked. Decide.

    कThe contract is valid and B must pay more खB has no remedy, as he failed to check the books गA cannot escape by saying B could have checked; B may avoid the contract घOnly the accountant who kept the books is liable
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

27. Principle: A State that receives a foreign diplomatic mission must protect its premises, which are inviolable; the receiving State's agents may not enter them without the consent of the head of the mission. Facts: Police of the receiving State enter a foreign embassy without the ambassador's consent to arrest a person who has taken shelter there. Decide.

    कThe entry is lawful if made at night खThe entry is lawful because the person is a criminal गThe entry violates the inviolability of the mission's premises घThe embassy loses its protection once anyone shelters there
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

28. Principle: An agreement that is merely an agreement to agree in the future, leaving essential terms to be settled later, is not an enforceable contract. Facts: A and B sign a paper saying, 'We shall enter into a contract for the sale of A's land at a price to be agreed later.' No price is ever agreed. B sues A to compel the sale. Decide.

    कB succeeds, as the paper was signed खB fails, as there was only an agreement to agree गB succeeds at the market price fixed by the court घA must pay B the value of the land
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

29. Principle: A husband is bound to maintain his wife, and if he neglects or refuses to do so without sufficient reason, the wife may claim maintenance through the court. Facts: H, a government officer, drives his wife W out of the house without any reason and refuses to give her any money for food or shelter. Decide.

    कW can claim maintenance from H through the court खW has no claim, as she is no longer living with H गW can claim maintenance only from her parents घW must first divorce H to claim anything
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

30. Principle: A marriage may be dissolved by divorce on the mutual consent of husband and wife, subject to the procedure prescribed by law. Facts: H and W, after years of separation, jointly petition the court for divorce, both freely agreeing to it and following the prescribed procedure. Decide.

    कThe court must order them to live together खDivorce is impossible unless one party proves cruelty गThe court may grant divorce on their mutual consent घOnly the husband may seek divorce
    💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

    छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

    पठाउनुहोस्

    टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।