Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

541. Principle: A gift of immovable property is complete only when it is made by a registered deed of transfer, as required by law. Facts: A orally tells his son that he is gifting him his house, but no deed is ever prepared or registered. A dies, and his other children claim a share of the house. Decide.

     कThe gift is complete, because A said it before witnesses. खThe gift is complete, because the son is A's heir. गThe house goes to the government. घThe gift is not complete, so the house forms part of A's estate.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

542. Principle: An event broken by a new and independent act of a third party, which was not reasonably foreseeable, breaks the chain of causation, and the original wrongdoer is not liable for the harm caused by that act. Facts: A negligently causes a minor accident that injures B slightly. While B is in hospital, C, a stranger, enters and deliberately shoots B. Decide.

     कA is liable for the shooting, because B would not have been in hospital otherwise. खA and C are equally liable for the shooting. गThe hospital alone is liable for the shooting. घA is not liable for the shooting, because C's deliberate act broke the chain of causation.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

543. Principle: The court of first instance should not proceed with a suit if the same matter between the same parties is already pending before another competent court. Facts: A sues B in District Court X for recovery of a debt. While that suit is pending, A files an identical suit against B in District Court Y. Decide.

     कCourt Y should stay the second suit. खCourt Y must decide first, because it is newer. गBoth courts should decide independently. घCourt X must stop and transfer the case to Court Y.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

544. Principle: A matter that has been finally decided between the same parties by a competent court cannot be tried again between them (res judicata). Facts: A sued B for ownership of a plot and lost after a full hearing; the judgment became final. A now files a new suit against B claiming ownership of the same plot. Decide.

     कThe new suit is valid, because A has a right to sue. खThe new suit is barred by res judicata. गThe new suit is valid if filed in another court. घThe new suit is valid, because land disputes never end.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

545. Principle: In a criminal case, the prosecution must prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt; if a reasonable doubt remains, the accused must be acquitted. Facts: The evidence against A creates strong suspicion, but a reasonable doubt remains about whether he committed the crime. Decide.

     कA must be convicted, because suspicion is strong. खA must prove his innocence. गA must be acquitted. घA must be given half the punishment.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

546. Principle: Whoever wants the court to give judgment based on the existence of a fact must prove that fact. Facts: A sues B claiming that B borrowed Rs. 2 lakh and has not repaid. B denies ever borrowing. Decide.

     कB must prove that he did not borrow. खThe court must presume that B borrowed. गA must prove that B borrowed the money. घBoth must prove their case equally before anything is decided.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

547. Principle: A statement made by a person about the cause of his death or the circumstances leading to it is admissible as evidence when that person has died. Facts: Before dying in hospital, B tells the doctor that A stabbed him. B dies the next day. At A's trial, the doctor wants to testify about B's statement. Decide.

     कThe statement is inadmissible, because it is hearsay. खThe statement is inadmissible, because B is dead. गThe statement is admissible only if A agrees. घThe statement is admissible as a dying declaration.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

548. Principle: A witness may give evidence only of what he himself saw or heard; what someone else told him about a fact is hearsay and is generally not admissible to prove that fact. Facts: W testifies in court that his friend X told him that X saw A stab B. Decide.

     कW's statement is hearsay and is generally not admissible to prove the stabbing. खW's statement is direct evidence of the stabbing. गW's statement is admissible, because X is his friend. घW's statement proves that A stabbed B.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

549. Principle: A person whose rights will be affected by a decision must be given a fair opportunity to be heard before the decision is made, and must be told the case against him. Facts: A university expels a student for cheating on the basis of a secret report, without telling him the allegations or letting him respond. Decide.

     कThe expulsion is valid, because the university has full discretion. खThe expulsion violates natural justice. गThe expulsion is valid, because cheating is serious. घThe expulsion is valid if the report is true.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

550. Principle: Every person has a right to privacy concerning his personal information, including health information. Facts: A hospital, without the patient's consent, posts a patient's HIV test result on its public notice board. Decide.

     कThe hospital acted lawfully, because the result is true. खThe hospital has violated the patient's right to privacy. गThe hospital acted lawfully to warn the public. घThe patient violated hospital rules by being tested.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।