Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ
Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – कानुन प्रवेश
Legal Reasoning · Law Entrance – Legal Reasoning, Constitution, English & GK · ६२५ प्रश्न
६२५ प्रश्न उपलब्ध। मोड छान्नुहोस्:
Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर
सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।
सही: ० / ०
-
Principle: No one shall be a judge in his own cause. Facts: A judge hears and decides a case involving a company in which his wife holds a large number of shares, without disclosing this. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) The decision can be challenged on the ground of bias.
The rule nemo judex in causa sua requires that justice must not only be done but be seen to be done. A family financial interest creates a reasonable likelihood of bias.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: An arrested person must be produced before the adjudicating authority within 24 hours of arrest, excluding the time needed for the journey. Facts: Police arrest A and keep him in custody for three days, without producing him before any court or adjudicating authority. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) A's detention after 24 hours is unlawful.
The 24-hour rule exists to put every arrest under prompt judicial control. Keeping A for three days without production breaks this requirement.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: No person accused of an offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. Facts: During trial, the court orders the accused to answer questions that would prove his guilt, and threatens to punish him if he stays silent. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) The order violates the right against self-incrimination.
The principle protects an accused from being forced to give evidence against himself. Compelling answers by threat of punishment directly breaches this right.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: No person shall be punished for an act which was not punishable by law when it was done. Facts: In 2020 A did an act that was lawful at the time. In 2023 a new law makes such acts a crime, and A is prosecuted for his 2020 act. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) A cannot be punished, because the act was lawful when it was done.
Criminal law cannot be applied retrospectively to acts that were lawful when done. The rule protects people who acted in reliance on the law of the time.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: No person shall be prosecuted or punished more than once for the same offence. Facts: A is tried for murder and acquitted by a competent court. A year later the police file a fresh case against A for the same murder. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) The second prosecution is barred.
This is the rule against double jeopardy: after a final acquittal for an offence, the person cannot be tried again for the same offence. The seriousness of the crime does not change this.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Kidnapping from lawful guardianship is taking a minor out of the keeping of the lawful guardian without the guardian's consent; the minor's own consent is irrelevant. Facts: Without telling her parents, A takes a 14-year-old girl away from her home to another city. The girl says she went willingly. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) A has committed kidnapping, because the guardian did not consent.
Under the stated principle, only the guardian's consent matters. The minor's willingness does not make the taking lawful.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A person is not liable for an act done while intoxicated if the intoxicant was given to him without his knowledge or against his will, and he was therefore incapable of knowing the nature of the act. Facts: Without A's knowledge, B mixes a strong drug into A's tea. Unaware of what he is doing, A breaks C's window. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) A is not liable, because his intoxication was involuntary.
The principle protects only involuntary intoxication that destroys awareness. A was drugged without his knowledge, so the defence applies; B may be liable instead.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Nothing is an offence if it is done by a person who, by reason of a mistake of fact and not a mistake of law, in good faith believes himself bound or justified by law in doing it. Facts: A police officer, ordered to arrest X, arrests Z in good faith after making due enquiry, believing Z to be X. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) The officer has committed no offence.
The officer made a good-faith mistake about identity, which is a mistake of fact. The principle excuses such mistakes, though not mistakes of law.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: An act not intended to cause death or grievous hurt is not an offence because of any harm it causes to an adult who freely consented to suffer the risk of that harm. Facts: A and B, both adults, agree to a friendly wrestling match. Playing fairly, A accidentally injures B's shoulder. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) A has committed no offence, because B consented to the risk.
B freely consented to the ordinary risks of the match, and A did not intend serious harm. The defence of consent therefore applies.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Nothing is an offence which is done by accident, without criminal intention or knowledge, in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner with proper care. Facts: A is cutting wood with a hatchet, using proper care. The head of the hatchet suddenly flies off and kills C, who is standing nearby. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) A has committed no offence, because the death was an accident.
Cutting wood is lawful, A used proper care, and the death was a pure accident. So the defence of accident applies.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
यी अभ्यास प्रश्न हुन्, आधिकारिक प्रश्न होइनन्। पाठ्यक्रम, विज्ञापन र नतिजाका लागि सम्बन्धित निकायको आधिकारिक वेबसाइट हेर्नुहोस्। उत्तरमा गल्ती भेटे प्रश्नमुनिको "टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट" मा लेख्नुहोस्।
नमस्ते! पाठ्यक्रम, सामान्य ज्ञान, भाषा परीक्षा वा कुनै प्रश्नको उत्तर बुझ्न सोध्नुहोस्।
AI ले गल्ती गर्न सक्छ। महत्वपूर्ण कुरा आधिकारिक स्रोतमा जाँच्नुहोस्।