Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

601. Principle: Displaying goods with price tags is only an invitation to make offers; it is the customer who makes the offer, which the seller may accept or refuse. Facts: A shop displays a watch priced at Rs. 2,000. Z picks it up and offers Rs. 2,000 at the counter, but the shopkeeper refuses to sell. Decide.

     कThe shopkeeper is not bound to sell, because the display was only an invitation to treat. खThe shopkeeper must sell, because the price tag was an offer. गZ can sue for breach of contract. घThe shopkeeper must sell, because Z picked up the watch.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

602. Principle: An offer may be revoked at any time before it is accepted. Facts: A offers to sell his car to B for Rs. 8 lakh. Before B replies, A informs B that he withdraws the offer. B then says, 'I accept.' Decide.

     कThere is no contract, because the offer was revoked before acceptance. खThere is a contract, because B accepted the price. गThere is a contract, because an offer cannot be withdrawn. घA must pay compensation to B for withdrawing.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

603. Principle: An acceptance must be communicated to the offeror; a mental decision to accept is not enough. Facts: A offers to sell his motorbike to B. B decides in his own mind to accept but tells nobody, and A later sells the bike to C. Decide.

     कThere is a contract, because B had decided to accept. खThere is no contract between A and B, because B never communicated acceptance. गA is liable to B for selling to C. घThe sale to C is void.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

604. Principle: A person who deliberately enters another's land without lawful justification commits trespass, even if no damage is caused. Facts: A's cricket ball goes into B's garden. Without asking, A climbs over the wall to collect it and leaves without damaging anything. Decide.

     कA has not committed trespass, because he caused no damage. खA has not committed trespass, because the ball was his. गA has committed trespass, even though he caused no damage. घB has committed conversion by keeping the ball.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

605. Principle: A person who causes damage by an act which, without his fault, would not ordinarily have happened, may be presumed negligent unless he explains otherwise. Facts: A bag of flour falls from the upper window of A's warehouse and hits B, who is walking on the street below. B cannot say exactly how it fell. Decide.

     कB must prove exactly how the bag fell, or he loses. खA is not liable, because nobody saw the bag fall. गB is liable, because he walked under the warehouse. घA may be presumed negligent, because such an accident does not ordinarily happen without negligence.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

606. Principle: Harm caused in good faith to prevent a greater harm to persons or property is not actionable. Facts: A fire is spreading towards a village. To stop it, A pulls down B's empty hut that lies in the fire's path, and the village is saved. Decide.

     कA is liable, because he deliberately destroyed B's hut. खA is liable, because he did not ask B's permission. गThe village must compensate A for his work. घA is not liable, because he acted out of necessity to prevent greater harm.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

607. Principle: A person is not liable for harm caused directly by natural forces of such extraordinary nature that they could not reasonably be foreseen or guarded against. Facts: An unprecedented earthquake causes A's well-built compound wall to fall on B's parked car. Decide.

     कA is not liable, because the damage was caused by an act of God. खA is liable, because the wall belonged to him. गA is liable, because walls should withstand any earthquake. घB is liable, because he parked near the wall.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

608. Principle: Where a plaintiff's own carelessness contributes to the harm he suffers, the defendant remains liable but damages are reduced in proportion to the plaintiff's share of fault. Facts: A drives negligently and crashes into B's car. B's injuries are worse because B was not wearing a seat belt. Decide.

     कA is fully liable and B's carelessness is irrelevant. खA is liable, but B's damages will be reduced. गA is not liable at all, because B was careless. घB must pay damages to A for not wearing a seat belt.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

609. Principle: False imprisonment is the total restraint of a person's liberty without lawful justification. Facts: A blocks one footpath and stops B from going along it, but B is free to go back and take another route. Decide.

     कA has committed false imprisonment, because B was obstructed. खA has committed false imprisonment, because B was delayed. गA has not committed false imprisonment, because the restraint was not total. घA has committed trespass to land against B.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

610. Principle: Assault is an act that causes another person reasonable apprehension of immediate unlawful force. Facts: Standing on the far bank of a wide river with no bridge or boat, A shakes his fist and shouts at B on the other bank that he will beat him. Decide.

     कA has committed assault, because he threatened B. खA has committed assault, because he shook his fist. गA has not committed assault, because B could not reasonably fear immediate force. घA has committed battery, because he used threatening words.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।