Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ

Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर

सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।

सही: ० / ०

551. Principle: Freedom of expression is subject to reasonable restrictions, including restrictions to prevent contempt of court. Facts: A newspaper publishes false allegations that a judge takes bribes, intending to lower public confidence in the court. Decide.

     कThe publication is fully protected by freedom of expression. खOnly the judge personally can be punished. गThe publication can be restricted and punished as contempt of court. घThe newspaper is protected, because the press is free.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

552. Principle: When the government makes a clear promise intending others to act on it, and a person acts on it to his detriment, the government cannot go back on the promise unless overriding public interest requires it. Facts: The government announces a five-year tax holiday for new factories in a backward district. Relying on it, A sets up a factory. After one year, without any public interest reason, the government withdraws the exemption. Decide.

     कA cannot enforce it, because tax is a sovereign power. खA cannot enforce it, because there was no written contract. गA must pay double tax for the first year. घA can enforce the promised exemption against the government.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

553. Principle: In matters of public interest, any person who acts in good faith may approach the court even if he is not personally affected. Facts: A lawyer files a petition in the Supreme Court about industries polluting a river used by thousands of people. He himself does not live near the river. Decide.

     कThe petition is maintainable as public interest litigation. खThe petition must be dismissed, because the lawyer is not affected. गOnly the government can file such a case. घOnly the industries can file such a case.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

554. Principle: A writ of certiorari may be issued to quash a decision already made by a lower court or tribunal acting without jurisdiction or in violation of natural justice. Facts: A disciplinary authority dismisses an employee without giving him any chance to be heard. The employee seeks to have the dismissal order set aside. Decide.

     कA writ of certiorari to quash the order is appropriate. खA writ of prohibition is appropriate, because the order is already made. गA writ of quo warranto is appropriate. घA writ of habeas corpus is appropriate.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

555. Principle: A writ of prohibition is issued by a superior court to stop a lower court or tribunal from continuing a proceeding beyond its jurisdiction. Facts: A tribunal set up only to hear labour disputes starts hearing a land ownership case. Before it decides, the affected party approaches the higher court. Decide.

     कA writ of mandamus is the appropriate remedy. खA writ of prohibition is the appropriate remedy. गA writ of quo warranto is the appropriate remedy. घA writ of habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

556. Principle: A writ of quo warranto may be issued to remove a person who holds a public office without legal authority or qualification. Facts: A person who does not possess the minimum qualifications fixed by law is appointed to and occupies a public office. Decide.

     कA writ of mandamus is the appropriate remedy. खA writ of prohibition is the appropriate remedy. गA writ of quo warranto is the appropriate remedy. घA writ of habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

557. Principle: A writ of mandamus can be issued to compel a public authority to perform a public duty imposed on it by law. Facts: An applicant fulfils every legal condition for a licence, and the law says the authority 'shall issue' it. The authority refuses without any reason. Decide.

     कA writ of habeas corpus is the proper remedy. खA writ of quo warranto is the proper remedy. गNo remedy is available, because licensing is discretionary. घA writ of mandamus is the proper remedy.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

558. Principle: An act done by an authority beyond the powers given to it by law is void (ultra vires). Facts: A municipality, empowered by law only to collect waste-management fees, issues an order imposing income tax on its residents. Decide.

     कThe order is valid, because the municipality is a government body. खThe order is valid if the residents agree. गThe order is valid for one year. घThe order is void, because it is beyond the municipality's powers.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

559. Principle: A person to whom a power has been delegated cannot further delegate it unless expressly permitted (delegatus non potest delegare). Facts: A statute gives the Chief District Officer power to cancel arms licences. Without any authority, the CDO hands this power to his office clerk, who cancels A's licence. Decide.

     कThe cancellation is invalid, because the power was wrongly sub-delegated. खThe cancellation is valid, because the clerk works in the CDO's office. गThe cancellation is valid, because the CDO approved the clerk. घThe cancellation is valid if A broke a rule.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।

560. Principle: Equality before law does not prevent the State from making special provisions for groups that are socially or economically disadvantaged. Facts: The government reserves some scholarships only for students from economically poor families. A student from a rich family challenges this as discrimination. Decide.

     कThe scheme is invalid, because all students must be treated alike. खThe scheme is valid as a special provision for the disadvantaged. गThe scheme is invalid, because it uses public money. घThe scheme is valid only if the rich student also gets a scholarship.
     💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)

     छलफल / प्रश्न उत्तरमा गल्ती छ

     पठाउनुहोस्

     टिप्पणी जाँचपछि मात्र देखिन्छ।