Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – Legal Reasoning MCQ
Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क) – कानुन प्रवेश
Legal Reasoning · Law Entrance – Legal Reasoning, Constitution, English & GK · ६२५ प्रश्न
६२५ प्रश्न उपलब्ध। मोड छान्नुहोस्:
Legal Reasoning (कानुनी तर्क): प्रश्न र उत्तर
सही लागेको विकल्पमा थिच्नुहोस्। सही भए हरियो, गलत भए रातो देखिन्छ; ३ सेकेन्डपछि सही उत्तर र व्याख्या देखिन्छ।
सही: ० / ०
-
Principle: No one can transfer a better title to goods than he himself has. Facts: T steals B's bicycle and sells it to C, who buys honestly and pays full price. B finds the bicycle with C. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) B is entitled to recover the bicycle from C.
A thief has no title, so he cannot pass any title to the buyer (nemo dat quod non habet). C's remedy lies against the thief T, not the owner.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A finder of lost goods has a better right to them than everyone except the true owner. Facts: A finds a gold ring on a public road. C, who is not the owner, snatches it from A, claiming that A has no title. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) A is entitled to the ring as against C.
The finder's possessory title is good against everyone except the true owner (Armory v Delamirie). C, being a stranger, has no better claim.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A person holding another's goods for safe keeping (bailee) must take as much care of them as a person of ordinary prudence would take of his own goods. Facts: A leaves his car with garage owner B for servicing. B leaves the car unlocked on the road overnight with the key inside, and it is stolen. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) B is liable for the loss of the car.
A prudent owner would never leave his own car unlocked with the key inside overnight, so B breached the bailee's duty of care. The theft does not excuse B's negligence.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A principal is bound by acts done by his agent within the scope of the agent's authority. Facts: P authorises his agent A to buy 50 quintals of rice. A buys 50 quintals from C in P's name. P refuses to pay C. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) P is bound to pay C.
The agent acted exactly within his authority, so the contract binds the principal. That is the whole purpose of appointing an agent.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A contract requires an offer by one party and its acceptance by the other; two identical offers that cross in the post do not make a contract. Facts: On the same day, A writes to B offering to sell 100 bags of cement at Rs. 800 per bag, and B writes to A offering to buy 100 bags at Rs. 800 per bag. The letters cross. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) There is no contract, because there are only cross offers and no acceptance.
Identical cross offers are still two offers; neither is an acceptance of the other. A contract arises only when one of them is accepted.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Agreements made in a social or domestic setting are presumed not to be intended to create legal relations and are not enforceable. Facts: A husband promises his wife a monthly allowance of Rs. 5,000 while living together happily. He later stops paying. Decide.
सही उत्तर: क) The wife cannot sue, because there was no intention to create legal relations.
Ordinary family arrangements are presumed not to be legally binding (Balfour v Balfour). Under the given principle the promise is not enforceable as a contract.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: A person who enjoys the benefit of a thing delivered to him by mistake, not intended as a gift, must pay for it or return it. Facts: A trader mistakenly delivers bags of rice to B's house instead of C's. B knows of the mistake but cooks and eats the rice. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ख) B must pay the trader for the rice.
This is a quasi-contractual obligation: a person who accepts the benefit of a non-gratuitous delivery must compensate. The absence of an actual contract does not excuse B.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Agreements by way of wager (betting) are void, and no suit can be brought to recover anything won on a wager. Facts: A and B bet Rs. 5,000 on the result of a cricket match. A wins, but B refuses to pay. Decide.
सही उत्तर: ग) A cannot recover the money by suing B.
A bet on an uncertain event is a wagering agreement and is void under the principle. The court will not help the winner recover.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Every agreement in restraint of the marriage of any person (other than a minor) is void. Facts: A promises to pay his adult nephew B Rs. 5 lakh if B never marries. B stays unmarried for ten years and claims the money. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) B cannot recover, because the agreement is void as being in restraint of marriage.
The agreement directly restrains marriage, so the principle makes it void. Performance by B does not make a void agreement enforceable.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
-
Principle: Exaggerated praise of goods by a seller, which no reasonable person would take as a statement of fact, is not misrepresentation. Facts: A shopkeeper tells B, 'This is the finest tea in the whole world.' B buys it and finds it ordinary. Decide.
सही उत्तर: घ) B has no remedy, because the statement was mere sales talk.
Vague boasting (puffery) is not a statement of fact on which a reasonable buyer would rely. Therefore it is neither misrepresentation nor fraud.
💬 टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट (०)
यी अभ्यास प्रश्न हुन्, आधिकारिक प्रश्न होइनन्। पाठ्यक्रम, विज्ञापन र नतिजाका लागि सम्बन्धित निकायको आधिकारिक वेबसाइट हेर्नुहोस्। उत्तरमा गल्ती भेटे प्रश्नमुनिको "टिप्पणी / गल्ती रिपोर्ट" मा लेख्नुहोस्।
नमस्ते! पाठ्यक्रम, सामान्य ज्ञान, भाषा परीक्षा वा कुनै प्रश्नको उत्तर बुझ्न सोध्नुहोस्।
AI ले गल्ती गर्न सक्छ। महत्वपूर्ण कुरा आधिकारिक स्रोतमा जाँच्नुहोस्।